Respect Network service
Correction, removal and de-indexing of Reuters articles and the syndicated copies that spread them.
12,480+
Negative Links Removed
3,250+
Positive Press Placements
850+
Interviews Published
420+
Major Media Features
We pursue correction, removal or de-indexing of Reuters stories and their syndicated copies.
Because a wire story is republished widely, the original and the copies each need handling. We assess yours free and choose the strongest route for each.
What we remove
01
Requests to the outlet’s corrections and editorial complaint process for errors and for stories that no longer reflect the facts.
02
Requests to remove or anonymize the original story where the facts, the law or the circumstances support it.
03
Copies on aggregators, portals and regional publishers, including Yahoo, MSN and other partners.
04
Google and Bing requests that remove qualifying pages from results and lock in the outcome.
05
Defamation and privacy claims, and data-protection requests where the law applies to you.
Where we deliver
How it works
We read the article, check its sources and facts, note where it is syndicated or translated and choose the strongest route to removal, correction or de-indexing.
We assemble primary records that show what is wrong or outdated, such as filings, court records and correspondence, and preserve every copy of the story.
We submit documented requests through Reuters’s complaints or editorial process and work with counsel when a legal or data-protection claim is warranted.
We submit search-engine requests where they qualify, follow up until resolved and monitor for copies and reposts.
We rely on evidence and lawful routes, never on pressure or payment to a publisher.
We build the case the outlet, its partners and search engines act on.
A wire story spreads, so we treat the original and the downstream copies as one case. Where an article contains inaccurate or sensitive information, we pursue the editorial, legal and data-protection routes that fit, then push the result out of search. We are an independent service with no relationship with Reuters.
Typical scenarios
01
A Reuters article misstates a company’s legal status and ranks for its name.
→ We document the correct facts from primary records and submit a correction request through the editorial process.
Our goal: Article corrected and the update reflected in syndicated copies
02
A years-old article about an investigation does not mention that it was later closed.
→ We request an update from the outlet and file outdated-content requests with Google.
Our goal: Article updated or de-indexed so current facts appear in search
03
The same story appears on several aggregators and regional sites.
→ We make the request at the source and follow it through to each copy.
Our goal: Copies removed or updated once the source changes
Pay-for-results guarantee
You pay only when we get the content removed. No upfront fees, and the terms are confirmed in writing before we start.
FAQ
We pursue correction, update, removal or de-indexing through the outlet’s editorial process, its downstream partners, the courts and the search engines. Articles with factual errors, outdated facts or sensitive personal details are the strongest cases. We assess yours free and choose the route most likely to work.
Wire stories are distributed to partners, so we handle the original and then each copy. Once the source is corrected or withdrawn, we follow it through to the partner pages and file search-engine requests for any that remain.
We request updates, clarifications and, where the circumstances support it, anonymization, with documents that show how the facts changed. Outlets decide these requests on their editorial standards, so we build the strongest evidence for each.
We file de-indexing requests for qualifying cases, such as outdated content, personal information, court orders and, where they apply, right-to-be-forgotten routes. De-indexing removes the page from search results and is the layer that locks in the outcome.
No. We are an independent service. We submit your request through the outlet’s public editorial and complaints routes, and through legal and data-protection channels where they apply.
Our fee is tied to results: no removal, no fee. Every decision is the publisher’s, the platform’s or the court’s, so we assess your case first and confirm the strongest route and the terms in writing before we start.
Avoid these mistakes and your request is far stronger: demanding removal because a story is unflattering rather than showing what is wrong; threatening legal action you will not follow through; offering payment to a publisher; and contacting only the original while copies stay online. Send us the links instead and we will build one request with evidence.
Still have a question? Talk to our team
News outlets
Each platform has its own rules, reporting tools and escalation routes. Choose the one where the content lives.
Send us the links. We review them confidentially, free of charge, and show you the strongest route to getting them corrected, removed or de-indexed.
Let's Talk
