Respect Network service
Removal, correction and de-indexing of damaging news articles, syndicated stories and investigative blog posts.
12,480+
Negative Links Removed
3,250+
Positive Press Placements
850+
Interviews Published
420+
Major Media Features
We pursue removal, correction or de-indexing of articles that harm a person or business.
Each publisher and platform has its own process, so we choose the right route for each article: a documented correction request, a legal demand or a search-engine submission. We assess yours free.
What we remove
01
Articles on news sites that make false or unsupported claims about you or your business.
02
Copies on Yahoo Finance, MSN, PressReader and similar platforms that republish stories written elsewhere.
03
Contributor sites, executive magazines and investigative outlets such as Grit Daily, CEO Official Magazine, OffshoreAlert, IntelligenceLine, LegalObserver and BehindMLM.
04
Corrections, updates and clarifications for stories that are wrong or no longer reflect the facts.
05
The layer that locks in the result by removing articles from search results and rebuilding what people see.
Where we deliver
How it works
We read the article, check its sources and filings, note where it is hosted or syndicated and choose the strongest route to removal, correction or de-indexing.
We assemble documents that show what is false or outdated, such as regulatory records, court records and correspondence, and preserve the original pages.
We contact publishers and aggregators with specific, documented requests and work with defamation counsel when a legal claim is warranted.
We submit search-engine requests, follow up until resolved, push the result out of search and monitor for reposts and copies.
We rely on evidence and lawful routes, never on pressure or payment to a publisher.
We build the case each publisher, platform and search engine acts on.
Aggregators are protected for the content they distribute under Section 230, so we go to the original publisher and, where needed, a legal order. Once an article is corrected or removed, we also push it out of search so the result holds.
Typical scenarios
01
A trade publication article alleges a regulatory action against an executive that was never filed.
→ We gather proof from the regulator, send the editor a documented correction request and involve defamation counsel if needed.
Our goal: Article corrected or removed, with syndicated copies updated
02
A story appears on a news portal that republishes content written by another outlet.
→ We trace the original publisher, make the request there and follow it through to the copies.
Our goal: Syndicated copy removed once the source is corrected or withdrawn
03
An old article still ranks first and does not mention that the matter was later resolved.
→ We request an update from the publisher and file outdated-content and de-indexing requests with the search engines.
Our goal: Article updated or de-indexed so current facts appear in search
Pay-for-results guarantee
You pay only when we get the content removed. No upfront fees, and the terms are confirmed in writing before we start.
FAQ
We pursue removal, correction or de-indexing through the publisher, the platform or the courts. Articles with false statements of fact, claims citing filings that do not exist, and syndicated copies of a corrected story are the strongest cases. We assess yours free and choose the route most likely to work.
They republish or distribute articles written by others, so the strongest route runs through the original publisher, which carries the liability. Once the source is corrected or withdrawn, we follow it through to the aggregator copies and file search-engine requests for any that remain.
Each outlet has its own editorial approach, so we tailor the route. For contributor and trade publications we send documented requests citing the specific false statements. For investigative outlets we build the factual or legal angle they respond to, with defamation counsel where false facts are provable.
We ask the publisher for an update or clarification that reflects later developments, such as a dismissal or an acquittal, and file outdated-content and, where they apply, right-to-be-forgotten requests with Google. Together these change what people see when they search.
De-indexing removes the URL from Google and Bing results while the page itself may stay online. It is the layer that locks in the result, because most of the damage happens when people search your name.
Our fee is tied to results: no removal, no fee. Every decision is the publisher’s, the platform’s or the court’s, so we assess your case first and confirm the strongest route and the terms in writing before we start.
Avoid these mistakes and your request is far stronger: demanding removal because an article is unflattering rather than showing what is false; threatening legal action you will not follow through; offering payment to a publisher; and sending several uncoordinated requests. Send us the links instead and we will build one request with evidence.
Still have a question? Talk to our team
Sites we handle
Each platform has its own rules, reporting tools and escalation routes. Choose the one where the content lives.
Send us the links. We review them confidentially, free of charge, and show you the strongest route to getting them removed, corrected or de-indexed.
Let's Talk
