Respect Network service
Correction, removal and de-indexing of CoinDesk articles, opinion pieces and copies about founders, projects and exchanges.
12,480+
Negative Links Removed
3,250+
Positive Press Placements
850+
Interviews Published
420+
Major Media Features
We pursue correction, removal and de-indexing of CoinDesk content about founders, projects and exchanges.
News, opinion, newsletters and people pages each follow their own process, so we match the request to the format. We assess yours free and choose the strongest route.
What we remove
01
Requests through the outlet’s corrections and editorial standards process for errors and for stories that no longer reflect the facts.
02
Requests to remove or amend the original article, including opinion and contributor pieces, newsletters, event and people pages.
03
Copies on partner sites, aggregators and republished versions of the story.
04
Google and Bing requests that remove qualifying pages from results and lock in the outcome.
05
Defamation and privacy claims, and court orders where they apply.
Where we deliver
How it works
We read the article, check its sources and facts, note where it is syndicated or translated and choose the strongest route to removal, correction or de-indexing.
We assemble primary records that show what is wrong or outdated, such as filings, contracts, court records and project documents, and preserve every version of the story.
We submit documented requests through CoinDesk’s complaints or editorial process and work with counsel when a legal or data-protection claim is warranted.
We submit search-engine requests where they qualify, follow up until resolved and monitor for copies and reposts.
We rely on evidence and lawful routes, never on pressure or payment to a publisher.
We build the case the outlet, its partners and search engines act on.
Crypto coverage is quoted widely, so we treat the original and its copies as one case and pair the request with primary records the outlet can verify. Where a statement is provably false, we pursue the legal route, then push the result out of search. We are an independent service with no relationship with CoinDesk.
Typical scenarios
01
An article misstates a project’s ownership and token details and ranks for its name.
→ We document the correct facts from primary records and submit a correction request through the outlet’s process.
Our goal: Article corrected, with the update reflected in syndicated copies
02
An older article about an investigation does not mention that it was later closed.
→ We request an update or follow-up from the outlet and file outdated-content requests with Google.
Our goal: Article updated or de-indexed so current facts appear in search
03
A contributor piece states as fact something about a founder that is false.
→ We document the statement, use the opinion and contributor process and involve counsel if needed.
Our goal: Piece corrected or removed, and the page de-indexed where it qualifies
Pay-for-results guarantee
You pay only when we get the content removed. No upfront fees, and the terms are confirmed in writing before we start.
FAQ
We pursue correction, update, removal or de-indexing through the outlet’s corrections and editorial standards process, the courts and the search engines. Articles with factual errors, outdated facts and provably false statements are the strongest cases. We assess yours free and choose the route most likely to work.
Opinion and contributor pieces follow their own process. We target the specific statements of fact that can be disproved, submit them with evidence and involve counsel where a claim exists.
We request an update or follow-up that reflects later developments, with documents that show how the facts changed, and file outdated-content requests with Google.
We file de-indexing requests for qualifying cases, such as outdated content, personal information and court orders. De-indexing removes the page from search results and is the layer that locks in the outcome.
No. We are an independent service. We use the outlet’s public corrections routes and the legal channels that apply.
Our fee is tied to results: no removal, no fee. Every decision is the publisher’s, the platform’s or the court’s, so we assess your case first and confirm the strongest route and the terms in writing before we start.
Avoid these mistakes and your request is far stronger: demanding removal because coverage is unflattering rather than showing what is wrong; threatening legal action you will not follow through; offering payment to a publisher; and contacting only the original while copies stay online. Send us the links instead and we will build one request with evidence.
Still have a question? Talk to our team
News outlets
Each platform has its own rules, reporting tools and escalation routes. Choose the one where the content lives.
Send us the links. We review them confidentially, free of charge, and show you the strongest route to getting them corrected, removed or de-indexed.
Let's Talk
